Thursday, June 6, 2019

Revenge and Delay in Hamlet Essay Example for Free

R neverthelessge and Delay in juncture EssayThe Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare is one of his most influential tragedies congress the story of treachery, retaliate and moral corruption. The play is ab come forth Prince Hamlet who seeks to exact revenge on his uncle Claudius for murdering his King Hamlet, Claudiuss brother. Hamlets stimulate so succeeds the throne and takes as his wife Gertrude, the old Kings Widow and Prince Hamlets father. As doth well appear unit our state, But to recuperate of us by strong (1. 1. 01-102) These word by Horatio, Prince Hamlets close friend reveals to the reader one of the crucial themes in this play, the need for revenge, not just by Hamlet but by Fortinbras, the Prince of Norway and Claudius through Laertes. Their emotions, thoughts and action are fueled by their craving for retaliation and as the three revenge plots intertwine, it is revealed that the nature of revenge is not simple but complicated as the re ader sees Hamlets inward struggle to take action, and his inability to make decisions.see to a greater extentconflict in hamletThe indecision, hesitation and delay are what make the plot stand out from other revenge stories. The main plot in the play is that of Hamlet who is visited by the Ghost of his father telling him to strike back his death. Hamlets response was Hast me to knowt, that I, with wings as swift, As guess or the thoughts of love, May sweep to my revenge (1. 5. 29-31)Sets the plot for revenge but later he is seen having his doubts as expressed in the line Fie upont, foh About, my brains (2. 2. 574).After Hamlet establishes Claudius guilt, by staging the murder of Gonzago he gets the opportunity to kill the unattended Claudius in his chamber but allows this opportunity pass after soliloquizing the matter and expression that killing Claudius will not be revenge as he will go to heaven. Throughout the play he is reflective and pensive and delays the second as long as he possibly can. He is later exiled when he accidentally kills Polonius. After another visit by his fathers ghost he makes up his mind.He returns to Denmark and in a fencing match that ensues, he manages to kill both Laertes and Claudius even though he dies from the pique he received from the Poisoned tip of Laertes sword. Claudius on the other hand, uses Laertes as tool to carry out his plan to kill Hamlet. Laertes is blinded by the need of vengeance such he would do whatever it takes to accomplish this without either hesitation whatsoever. Claudius takes advantage of this situation and its quite evident in the following lines Laertes, was your father dear to you? Are you like the painting of a sorrow (4. 7. 05-107) and To show your fathers son in deedmore than in words? (4. 7. 123-124) Laertes replies To cut throat ithe church. (4. 7. 125)Claudius cultivates this thirst and his ability to act rashly which drives him in a fencing match with Hamlet. This turns into a bloody e nding and ultimately leads to Hamlet and Claudius death. Fortinbras, the prince of Norway wants to avenge the death of his father by creating so large an army that would over the Danish army. He is a strong-willed leader described as zesty and full (1. 1. 96), with a tendency to act rashly as opposed to Hamlets continual hesitation delay.While Hamlet is contemplating on the issues of life, death and morality of revenge, Fortinbras is out to conquer lands. However, he also listens to his friend Horatio who advices him to wait before he attacks Denmark. This allows him in the end to achieve his vengeance without doing much. Hamlet himself considers Fortinbras a model of greatness, as he passed him with his army he remarks, To be great, is not to stir without great argument but to find quarrel in a straw, When honors at the stake. (4. 4. 52-55) Fortinbras is not bothered too much with thoughts and is quick to take action to preserve his familys honor.In conclusion it can be express that the main reason Hamlet fails on his mission of vengeance is due to his hesitation partly brought by his own cowardice and partly due to his inner conflict with the moral outlook of it all. Laertes fails because he is too quick to move into action without careful consideration of the situation at hand. Fortinbras on the other hand, succeeds because even though he was quick to take action, he listens to his uncles advice. In the end, this teaches the reader the importance of thinking clearly, coherently and sticking to our principles prior to taking any actions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.